Zimpfer vs palm beach county case

It could be that he was not able to convince the interview panel that he actually possessed those skills. Merriman performed better than Mr.

Zimpfer was nor hired, promoted, or compensated, or was discharged, laid off, or forced to retire; and 4 that the position was filled by a person younger than Mr.

Palm Beach County Case Zimpfer vs. To come up with scores, Dr. Brad Merriman, aged Zimpfer is, but also much younger than he is and would cost less. This is a case of age based discrimination. In case of Palm Beach County, Mr. Merriman having a better academic qualification than Mr.

He could introduce transcripts of the interviews of both men which would help prove that Mr. Since Zimpfer had been working with the county for 16 years, they would be able to get some more information about him from his past and present supervisors. This was established in the Supreme Court case Meacham v.

Zimpfer but he could possess more knowledge of the particular skills that are needed for this position. Requirement 2 on the other hand might be a little tricky to prove.

Zimpfer v Palm Beach County Case Study

I would also recommend recording or keeping minutes of each interview. Even though Brad had less experience than Bryce, he was appointed. Knolls Atomic Power Lab, U. This is a blanket ban against age discrimination. Zimpfer would not have any problem providing the evidence needed to satisfy requirements 1, 3, and 4.

If they were to lose this case, it would set up a precedent which would enable other aggrieved employees, present or past, to file more ADEA suits against Palm Beach County. The relevant code section is 29 U. He could produce the job performance reports he has received while working for the county that show him to be an exemplary worker, and recommend him for promotion.

Zimpfer could introduce to show that the county did in fact discriminate against him. Josephs is able to convince this jury then there is sufficient evidence to conclusively prove that Mr. He could also look to see if Palm Beach County has a trend of passing up older employees for younger employees when filling up managerial positions.

It also could be that she intentionally left out information that would be unfavorable to her client. This being the case, I would recommend they settle the suit outside the court. If they do decide to hire someone much younger than another applicant, they should make sure he is clearly more qualified for the job than the older candidate is.

Josephs did not take into consideration the conversations the interviewer had with each candidate. This would help prove that he decided to go with academic qualification instead of on the job experience when deciding which candidate to pick.

Zimpfer was a victim of discrimination, since her report shows that he is clearly more qualified for the position than Mr.Zimpfer v. Palm Beach County*, F.2d (11th Cir. ) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County: The Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County Case is a lawsuit filed by Mr.

Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County claiming an infringement of the age discrimination in the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. The “Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County” case is about a lawsuit filed by Mr. Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

Mr. Zimpher, age 52, has worked for the county’s employee relations area and this employment had lasted for 16 years.

Zimpfer v. Palm Beach County*, 853 F.2d 929 (11th Cir. 1988)

There was a vacancy which was. Palm Beach County” case is about a lawsuit filed by Mr. Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Mr. Zimpher, age 52, has worked for the county’s employee relations area and this employment had lasted for 16 years.

There was a vacancy which was advertised by [ ]. Read the attached case study documents and answer the following questions in words or more about Zimpfer v Palm Beach County: 1. Was Mr. Zimpfer a victim of illegal age discrimination according to the ADEA and case law?

Why. Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Mr.

Zimpher, age 52, has worked for the county’s employee relations area and this employment had lasted for 16 years. There was a vacancy which was advertised by the county for the position of.

Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County Case Download
Zimpfer vs palm beach county case
Rated 5/5 based on 52 review