The North, by forbidding slaves in the territories ensured that it would maintain this majority. That president used unConstitutional means to begin and prosecute a war. The Constitution, not being made for this purpose, was therefore flawed.
The North defied laws passed under this Constitutional provision. Constitutional Failure, — Step 7: The industrial section managed from on, to obtain more senators who supported the industrial agenda and to deny the nonindustrial section an equal number of senators with which to oppose the industrial agenda.
He then went on to condemn the North and further justify his view on slavery. As it turned out, they were right -- the Constitution had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created.
The Constitution promised to protect minorities was by making local matters the responsibility of the state governments so that a national majority could not impose its desires upon local minorities who had other desires that resulted from their particular circumstances as to climate, or geography, or culture, or social institutions.
The Constitution had attempted to prevent states from imposing slavery upon or abolishing slavery in other states. Emerson pointed out a very significant gap, weakness, in the Constitution. What has begun is a using of the Constitution in an area where its use was not intended, in order to justify ones views on a particular subject--in this case slavery.
But at that time, the problem was that it was becoming vulnerable to attack as such. But a promise is only as good as the people who have the power to break it. First was Jefferson Davis: The result was the failure of national unity, or the destruction of the Union.
It was supposed to bind the U. In conclusion, all of these statements by these great men interlocked to from a general warning that something was going to happen to the Union. The framers of the Constitution had thought the power of elected officials could be controlled by making their terms in office of short duration, but when elected officials tried to govern with integrity and honesty, they found that the majority would vote them out of office and vote into office demagogues who would take from the minority and give to the majority.
Certified Educator You ask about Constitutional causes of the War of Even two great presidents of the U. The people, however, were looking for a way to justify their conflicting actions, and they did so via the Constitution.
Want analysis or more info? As long as a state was in the Union, it should have abided by the Constitution, and if it found that it could not abide some provision of the Constitution, it should have seceded.
Sample Student Essays Question: This publication and any copies made from it may not be resold. The reason was simple: Prior to this period the manufacturing section had obtained tariffs that the consuming section did not want—in the Republican party proposed increases and in won the government; the manufacturing section used its majority in Congress to raise taxes for building of railroads and improvement of rivers and harbors, even though the sections that did not need these transportation subsidies did not want to pay these taxes; the nonslaveholding section used its state governments to defy the fugitive slave law which was wanted by the planting section and was Constitutional—the opposition by state governments was not Constitutional; the manufacturing section used its majority to elect a President which no other section wanted, indeed it was the urban centers of the manufacturing section that elected him as many rural counties of the manufacturing section voted for one or another of his opponents.
This material may not be mass distributed, electronically or otherwise.
And when these many great men agree on the same concept, one knows that they are definitely true and just in what they are saying. You ask about Constitutional causes of the War of Jan 08, · Best Answer: By the 's the Constitution became a source of sectional discord, ultimately contributing to the failure of the union.
This tries to disprove this ultimedescente.com the mid's, many events occurred that increased sectional tension between the Northern and Southern states of the ultimedescente.com: Resolved.
Assignment: "By the 's the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created.".
When the United States Constitution was ratified init was meant to unite the colonies, protect the rights and liberties of American citizens, and establish laws common throughout the nation.
But by the 's, it had begun to tear apart the Union it had been created to bring together. Dbq by the 's the constitution was starting to become the source of sectional discord and tension which led to conflictions in the union. the way the constitution was written, it was very vague considering slavery.
because of the constitution being so vague, this left states free to interpret the principles stated in their own way. the reason /5(2). "By the 's the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity had become a a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created" using your knowledge of the period ofasess the validity of this statement.
Which statement best explains President Lincoln's justification for the Civil War? a. As an abolitionist, President Lincoln wanted to end slavery in the United States.
President Lincoln wanted to keep the South economically dependent on the industrial North. c. President Lincoln's oath of office required him to defend and preserve the Union.